GE – A Quick Review of Our Thoughts

Print Friendly
Share on LinkedIn0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0

SEE LAST PAGE OF THIS REPORT Graham Copley / Nick Lipinski

FOR IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES 203.901.1629/203.989.0412


June 12th, 2017

GE – A Quick Review of Our Thoughts

  • We also add the text from our Friday Findings email of June 6th:

“Last week, GE stepped back from targets on costs and earnings agreed with key shareholder, Trian, only 2 months after the targets were agreed – this against a backdrop of improving US and Chinese growth and a White House talking up the US economy at every opportunity. We see this as somewhat defeatist and it suggests that GE management does not have its arms around the company properly. Either the arms are too short (management is not up to it) or the company is too big. Regardless of the reason it is time for change at GE. While the company continues to miss targets its accounting is so complex that it is right to question whether they understand what they have. Cash flows do not correlate with earnings – and the regular question is whether cash flows show the underlying state of earnings or whether earnings show the underlying state of cash flows – if it is the former, there is less value in the company than we believe.

Overwhelming everything is volatile cash accounting – around working capital changes and M&A that result in the range of estimates for 2018 shown in the exhibit below. With this range of estimates how can any investor understand what they have or get confident that the company understands what it is managing”.

Exhibit 1

Source: Bloomberg and SSR Analysis

  • New leadership is good news in our view – but new leadership alone will not fix GE’s problems – the issues of complexity remain and Mr. Flannery is an insider – perhaps not as open to the idea of radical change as an outsider might be.
    • Note that Mr. Immelt has played a reasonable “incremental” strategy given the hand that he was dealt; and it has not worked.
    • A more radical strategy is likely needed here as we have indicated in the research referenced above. The company needs to address:

      • Complexity – is the company/story just too much to manage
      • Optimism – maybe again with targets for this year? – it is very difficult to manage a business properly if you are continually over-estimating what it can do
      • Returns on capital – on an improving trend, but only because of the offloading of poor return financial assets thus far
      • Costs – this is where insiders tend to struggle – it took fresh eyes at DuPont and Air Products to drive costs materially lower

©2017, SSR LLC, 225 High Ridge Road, Stamford, CT 06905. All rights reserved. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, and its accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein.  The views and other information provided are subject to change without notice.  This report is issued without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient and is not construed as a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future results.

Print Friendly